A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out between possible neighbours more than the development of a wall in a coastal site inside of a north Dublin suburb, a case which has captivated national awareness following an Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed family members residence at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of scheduling breaches, environmental worries, and extended-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Occasions post about René Collier and the Irish Periods posting about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a neighborhood disagreement has developed right into a hugely publicised legal struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than development will work at the internet site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a corporation director respectively, request to make their spouse and children household. The case is now emblematic of broader disputes together Ireland’s coastline, exactly where development pressures collide with environmental protections and the sensitivities of founded citizens. According to the Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall staying created by their prospective neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted beneath preparing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, the two people of Dublin Street, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their organizing authorization by building a wall outside of the boundaries of their web-site, leading to an encroachment over a Unique Place of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, as a result areas are subject matter to strict controls beneath European and Irish environmental regulation. In their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even insignificant encroachments could have lasting ecological penalties, specifically inside of a delicate coastal surroundings which include Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They're in breach in their scheduling permission, and say the wall, which can be partially designed, is in the proper placement. Their authorized crew has characterised the motion being an attempt to hold off or frustrate a lawful improvement. The couple accuse litigants of in search of to halt homebuilding in order to preserve their see, an allegation that has been repeated in court and referenced in coverage of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal planning disputes, the place sights of the sea are the two extremely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained dramatic efforts through the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by way of ocean in storm to photograph the internet site, In line with sworn proof referenced during the Irish Occasions. In one account, Rene Collier waded by waistline-substantial drinking water throughout a storm to photograph the website Irish Times, a picture which includes due to the fact grow to be emblematic of your depth of your dispute. These actions were not basically symbolic; they were being intended to gather Visible proof on the wall’s place relative to tidal traces and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website within the sea Irish Situations reported, describing how The 2 Guys entered the water for the duration of serious climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm water to photograph the positioning turned Among the most placing descriptions to arise from court docket reporting. The Irish Instances post about accountant Paul Feely famous that this sort of actions were cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ belief the wall prolonged into a location afflicted by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was getting encroached on.
The activities at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 have been protected intimately through the nationwide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Occasions 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Periods January 27 2026 turned greatly searched phrases as viewers sought to be familiar with the history and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court read even more submissions on irrespective of whether interim orders really should be granted to halt design pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a critical moment within the authorized timeline.
In the core of the dispute is a disagreement more than boundaries, planning compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely retain the wall, as manufactured, goes outside of what was authorized and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, is referred to as meticulous in his assessment of preparing paperwork, maps, and conditions attached into the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have equally stressed that their action is determined by issue for environmental protection and adherence to arranging legislation. They reject promises that the situation is about preserving A personal view, insisting in its place that it's about making sure that improvement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limits. In affidavits, they have got explained their long-standing relationship to the region as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a few simply looking to build a relatives home in accordance While using the law. They deny the wall encroaches over a Distinctive Location of Conservation and say that each one is effective have already been completed dependant on Expert tips and authorised plans. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the remarkable actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, like coming into The ocean all through a storm, do not change the fundamental facts.
The situation has also Paul Feely and René Collier lifted broader questions on how setting up disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute around design of wall at coastal web-site happens to be a shorthand description for just a problem that numerous observers see as significantly popular. As sea degrees increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation in between non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become more contentious.
The Irish Situations posting about René Collier observed that the businessman experienced Earlier been associated with local advocacy on scheduling and environmental difficulties, even though not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Periods report about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people from very unique Specialist backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in this kind of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, are becoming synonymous with the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site with the sea Irish Occasions protection emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by means of midsection-higher drinking water throughout a storm to photograph the location Irish Occasions and René Collier waded by way of midsection-higher drinking water all through a storm to photograph the website Irish Moments are phrases that appeared consistently in protection, reflecting each the physical fact with the coastline and the symbolic nature in the act. For supporters with the plaintiffs, these steps shown determination; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an too much approach.
Because the High Court proceedings proceed, the end result stays uncertain. The courtroom have to figure out if the wall as developed complies with arranging permission and no matter whether any encroachment right into a Specific Spot of Conservation has transpired. The authorized arguments are sophisticated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal information, and preparing situations. However the human element continues to be central: neighbours who will have to Stay along with each other extensive once the authorized prices are actually paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above construction is effective at the location on Dublin Road, Sutton, though the implications of the case increase outside of that deal with. For planners, builders, and citizens alike, the dispute serves to be a reminder of the value of clarity in preparing permissions and sensitivity in coastal enhancement. What's more, it underscores how rapidly an area disagreement can escalate when basic difficulties including environmental security and home legal rights are perceived to be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays a place of normal beauty and contested boundaries. The wall with the centre of the dispute stands partially created, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved legal queries. Whether it's going to in the long run be altered, removed, or finished as planned will depend upon the court docket’s conclusions. Till then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will probably continue on to look in headlines, joined indelibly to one of the most closely viewed planning disputes in north Dublin in recent years.