A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out concerning possible neighbours above the development of a wall in a coastal website in the north Dublin suburb, a circumstance that has attracted countrywide interest adhering to an Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed relatives dwelling at Sutton Strand, exactly where allegations of setting up breaches, environmental issues, and extended-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled to the courts. The Irish Periods posting about René Collier and also the Irish Instances write-up about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a local disagreement has advanced into a highly publicised legal struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around design is effective at the site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, where by Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a firm director respectively, search for to develop their household property. The case has become emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, where by progress pressures collide with environmental protections plus the sensitivities of recognized inhabitants. According to the Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall remaining created by their prospective neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted underneath organizing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, equally residents of Dublin Street, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their arranging authorization by creating a wall beyond the boundaries of their web page, resulting in an encroachment with a Particular Area of Conservation. The SAC designation is central on the dispute, therefore regions are issue to rigid controls less than European and Irish environmental law. Inside their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even small encroachments could have Long lasting ecological consequences, notably inside of a sensitive coastal setting which include Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They may be in breach in their setting up authorization, and say the wall, that is partially created, is in the proper position. Their legal group has characterised the action as an try to delay or frustrate a lawful growth. The pair accuse litigants of trying to get to halt homebuilding as a way to protect their look at, an allegation that's been repeated in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the heart of numerous coastal planning disputes, where views of The ocean are both of those really prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained spectacular initiatives with the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded via ocean in storm to photograph the website, Based on sworn evidence referenced during the Irish Periods. In one account, Rene Collier waded by means of waist-superior drinking water for the duration of a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Occasions, a picture which has given that turn out to be emblematic of your intensity from the dispute. These steps were not just symbolic; they had been meant to Get Visible evidence of your wall’s situation relative to tidal lines and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site with the sea Irish Instances claimed, describing how the two Adult males entered the water all through extreme climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by means of storm h2o to photograph the site grew to become Probably the most placing descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Instances posting about accountant Paul Feely famous that such actions were being cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ perception that the wall prolonged into a region affected by tidal movement, strengthening their argument that the SAC was currently being encroached on.
The activities at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been lined intimately via the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Instances 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Moments January 27 2026 grew to become widely searched phrases as Rene Collier waded through waist-high water during a storm to photograph the site Irish Times audience sought to understand the background and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court read further more submissions on whether or not interim orders should be granted to halt design pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a critical instant during the lawful timeline.
Within the core from the dispute is often a disagreement in excess of boundaries, arranging compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely sustain which the wall, as produced, goes past what was authorised and intrudes into secured land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, has actually been described as meticulous in his examination of scheduling documents, maps, and disorders hooked up to your authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have the two pressured that their action is enthusiastic by concern for environmental safety and adherence to scheduling regulation. They reject claims that the case is about preserving A non-public perspective, insisting alternatively that it is about guaranteeing that enhancement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they have described their lengthy-standing connection to the region and their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a few basically endeavoring to create a family members house in accordance With all the regulation. They deny that the wall encroaches on the Specific Space of Conservation and say that all functions are performed depending on Expert tips and approved designs. Their legal professionals have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the remarkable steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, which include getting into the sea all through a storm, tend not to change the fundamental facts.
The case has also raised broader questions on how planning disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute over building of wall at coastal web-site is becoming a shorthand description for any circumstance that numerous observers see as ever more prevalent. As sea degrees rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation in between personal land, public foreshore, and protected habitats has started to become more contentious.
The Irish Occasions article about René Collier mentioned the businessman experienced Beforehand been involved in regional advocacy on preparing and environmental troubles, nevertheless not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Situations write-up about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how men and women from incredibly diverse Qualified backgrounds can find themselves aligned in this kind of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some studies spell their names, became synonymous Along with the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location from your sea Irish Instances protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded as a result of waist-superior water during a storm to photograph the location Irish Moments and René Collier waded via waist-substantial drinking water all through a storm to photograph the website Irish Moments are phrases that appeared regularly in coverage, reflecting equally the physical actuality of the coastline plus the symbolic mother nature on the act. For supporters of the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated motivation; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an extreme technique.
Given that the High Court proceedings carry on, the outcome remains uncertain. The court have to identify if the wall as designed complies with setting up authorization and regardless of whether any encroachment into a Special Space of Conservation has transpired. The legal arguments are complicated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal info, and arranging circumstances. Yet the human aspect continues to be central: neighbours who have to Dwell alongside each other extensive once the lawful charges have already been paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over development will work at the positioning on Dublin Road, Sutton, though the implications of the case increase further than that tackle. For planners, developers, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves for a reminder of the significance of clarity in planning permissions and sensitivity in coastal progress. In addition, it underscores how immediately a local disagreement can escalate when basic challenges for example environmental security and property rights are perceived to be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand continues to be an area of organic elegance and contested boundaries. The wall at the centre in the dispute stands partially crafted, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved lawful questions. No matter if it will eventually be altered, removed, or accomplished as planned will depend upon the court’s conclusions. Till then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will likely carry on to appear in headlines, joined indelibly to One of the more intently watched arranging disputes in north Dublin in recent times.